Legal Opinion

Ring v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 19, 1922PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.

Appellant was indicted and convicted under the statute which reads as follows:

“No person shall keep in his possession any still-worm or still without registering the same with the proper United States officer, and no person shall set up to be used as a distillery any still-worm or substitute therefor and a still or substitute therefor, such as a kettle, washpot, metal tank, or any other vessel of any kind for the purpose of using same, or which, after being so set up, may be used for the production of distilled spirits.” Acts of 1921, p. 372.

The language of the charging part of the indictment…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  2. McGuffin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  3. Ogburn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  4. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  5. Lolla v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API