Davis v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Appellants were jointly indicted and tried upon the charge of possessing a still, and at the trial witnesses J. D. and Harold Parker and Braswell, Woodall and Hays gave testimony which fully warranted the jury in finding- that the appellants were in possession of the still and were about to. make whiskey with it when they were arrested.
No testimony was introduced in behalf of appellants, and none of them testified. The prosecuting attorney, in Ms closing argument, stated: ‘ ‘ There is the testimony of Parker, and the testimony of Braswell, and of Wood-all, and of Hays, and of Harold Parker,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Davidson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Bridgman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Markham v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- Ring v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Edens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- Richmond v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Langston v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931