Clark v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The indictment under which appellant was tried contained two counts. He was convicted' under the first count, which charged that he had kept in his possession a certain stillworm and still without-registering the same with the proper United States officer.
Error is assigned in the refusal of the court to grant a continuance. In support of that motion appellant offered evidence tending to show the diligence he had employed to secure the attendance of certain absent witnesses. The evidence on this subject is to the following effect. Appellant had been bound over by a justice of the peace to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- McDaniel v. AshworthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Ring v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Barling v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. HolderIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
- Gurein v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
- Indian Bayou Drainage District v. DickieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Rosslot v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Burt v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.