Legal Opinion
In re iPhone Application Litig.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 12, 2012No. Case No. 11-MD-02250-LHKPublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.
A putative nationwide class of plaintiffs bring suit against Apple, Inc., Admob, Inc., Flurry, Inc., AdMarval, Inc., Google, Inc., and Medialets, Inc., (aside from Apple, collectively “Mobile Industry Defendants” 1) for alleged violations of federal and state law. Plaintiffs are United States’ residents who use mobile devices manufactured by Apple that operate Apple’s “iOS” proprietary operating systems, or what Plaintiffs refer to as iDevices (e.g., iPhone, iPad, and iPod Touch). Plaintiffs *1049cl…
2Cases cited81 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Perrin Davis v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- In Re Google Inc. Cookie Placement Consumer Privacy LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- In re Yahoo Mail LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
- In re Carrier IQ, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.