Legal Opinion
Carijano v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 1, 2011No. Nos. 08-56187, 08-56270PublishedCited by 131 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge WARDLAW; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge RYMER.
ORDER
The petition for panel rehearing is granted.
The opinion filed December 6, 2010, and reported at 626 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir.2010), is hereby withdrawn. It may not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit.
The clerk shall file the attached opinion and partial concurrence, partial dissent in place of the prior opinion and partial concurrence, partial dissent. The parties are free to file new petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc pursuant to Ninth Circuit General…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by131 opinions
- Loredana Ranza v. Nike, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Deb v. Sirva, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Global Comm. Trading Grp. v. Beneficio De Arroz Choloma, SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Luis Mujica v. Airscan Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Mary DiFederico v. Marriott International, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.