Legal Opinion

People v. LaFrankie

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 4, 1993No. 92SA476PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

The People bring this interlocutory appeal pursuant to section 16-12-102(2), 8A C.R.S. (1986), asking that we reject the determination of the trial court and reverse its order suppressing statements made to the police by the defendant. After examining the totality of the circumstances, the district court concluded that because the defendant was interviewed by the police for the purpose of obtaining a confession and because the defendant reasonably believed he was not free to leave, the defendant was subjected to a custodial interrogation. For these reasons, and due to the fact that the police…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. People v. ThiretSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  4. United States v. Terry Gene CarterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Howard C. PhelpsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. MathenySupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. People v. BreidenbachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. People v. in the Interest of D.F.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. People v. DraconSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. People v. JordanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API