People v. Thiret
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Justice.
The People filed this interlocutory appeal, pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1, to challenge a ruling of the district court suppressing various items of evidence including the following: a photograph and two rolls of film seized by law enforcement officers during an alleged consent search of the defendant’s home; the defendant’s automobile impounded by the police while it was parked outside the defendant’s home and any evidence obtained from a subsequent search of the vehicle; and statements made by the defendant to law enforcement officers in his home and later at the district attorney’s…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- People v. MathenySupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- People v. DrakeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- People v. BreidenbachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- People v. ViduyaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- People v. BossertSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.