Legal Opinion

People v. Dracon

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 15, 1994No. 94SA238PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Vollack

The prosecution brought this interlocutory appeal pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1 and section 16-12-102(2), 8A C.R.S. (1986 & 1998 Supp.), to challenge an order entered by the Denver District Court suppressing all statements made by the defendant, Marla Dracon (Dra-con), in response to a custodial interrogation by police officers. The district court held that the failure of the police officers to issue a Miranda 1 warning made their initial interrogation illegal, and that the post-Mircmda interrogation was the product of the initial illegal interrogation. We affirm the suppression order in part,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. People v. MathenySupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. State v. AndersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. in the Interest of D.F.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. People v. ValdezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  5. People v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API