People v. Dracon
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Vollack
The prosecution brought this interlocutory appeal pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1 and section 16-12-102(2), 8A C.R.S. (1986 & 1998 Supp.), to challenge an order entered by the Denver District Court suppressing all statements made by the defendant, Marla Dracon (Dra-con), in response to a custodial interrogation by police officers. The district court held that the failure of the police officers to issue a Miranda 1 warning made their initial interrogation illegal, and that the post-Mircmda interrogation was the product of the initial illegal interrogation. We affirm the suppression order in part,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- People v. MathenySupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- State v. AndersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. in the Interest of D.F.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- People v. ValdezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- People v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.