Legal Opinion

People v. Jordan

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 20, 1995No. 94SA401PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Yollack

The People bring this interlocutory appeal to challenge the district court’s order suppressing a statement made to police by the defendant, Johnathan Holden Jordan (the defendant). The district court found that, although the defendant voluntarily waived his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), he did not do so knowingly and intelligently. We find that the record does not support the district court’s suppression of the defendant’s statement. We therefore reverse the suppression order and remand the case for further proceedings.

I

On the evening of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Colorado v. SpringSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. People v. GenningsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. People v. DraconSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. People v. in the Interest of D.F.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. People v. ArroyaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. People v. HaleySupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  4. People v. PittsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  5. People v. PlattSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API