Legal Opinion
Archuleta v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 6, 2008No. 07-1065PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Although the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) generally requires an employer to pay its employees at a rate of one and one-half times their regular rate of pay for any time worked in excess of forty hours in a given workweek, it exempts from this requirement “executive, administrative or professional” employees. At issue here is whether full-time pharmacists working for Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. from 1993 through 1998 fell within this exemption. In arguing that they did not, Plaintiffs contend that, although Wal-Mart purported to pay its pharmacists as salaried professionals,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hinds v. Sprint/United Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Ellis v. J.R.'s Country Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- SCO Group, Inc. v. Novell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Deherrera v. Decker Truck Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- JR SIMPLOT v. Chevron Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Robinson-Smith v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.