Legal Opinion

Over v. Schiffling

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1885No. 11,815PublishedCited by 46 opinions

Erom the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The complaint of the appellee alleges that *192the appellant maliciously published a libel; that the libellous matter was contained in a letter written by the latter to a corporation called the Encaustic Tile Company, by whom the appellee was then employed. The letter, omitting the date, address, signature and formal part, is as follows:

“Mr. Schiffling owes me on work done on your dies, etc., $33. If you would consent to retain such amount out of any money due him from you, let me know by return mail. If you will not consent to do so, I shall have to file a mechanic's lien on the goods. He got…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Mescall v. TullyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. City of Logansport v. UhlIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Neidefer v. ChastainIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Weenig v. WoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Kelley v. TanoosIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Balue v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Hale v. Robertson & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API