Over v. Schiffling
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the Marion Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The complaint of the appellee alleges that *192the appellant maliciously published a libel; that the libellous matter was contained in a letter written by the latter to a corporation called the Encaustic Tile Company, by whom the appellee was then employed. The letter, omitting the date, address, signature and formal part, is as follows:
“Mr. Schiffling owes me on work done on your dies, etc., $33. If you would consent to retain such amount out of any money due him from you, let me know by return mail. If you will not consent to do so, I shall have to file a mechanic's lien on the goods. He got…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Goodwin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Union Mutual Life Insurance v. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Mescall v. TullyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- City of Logansport v. UhlIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Neidefer v. ChastainIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Weenig v. WoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Kelley v. TanoosIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Balue v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Hale v. Robertson & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.