Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Martin

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 8, 1995No. 2832PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The issue in this appeal is whether State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company is liable to indemnify its insured, Frederick Martin, for damages caused by intentional acts under a policy providing liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage “caused by accident.” The facts were stipulated by the parties and submitted to the court in an action for declaratory judgment. The trial court held that, even if the insured had acted intentionally and criminally, the damages were accidental from the perspective of the injured claimants; and, therefore, the insurer was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Esmond v. LISCIOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Gene's Restaurant, Inc. v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Germantown Insurance v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. HassingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. John W. Kraus, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of Linda E. Kraus, Deceased v. Allstate Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Jeffrey J. Sikirica, Esq., as Trustee of Pittsburgh Beauty Academy, Inc. v. Nationwide Insurance Company Jeffrey J. SikiricaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Estate of MehlmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  3. Northland Casualty Co. v. HBE Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2001
  4. Bailey v. Lincoln General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  5. Motorists Mutual Insurance Company v. PinkertonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API