NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF MINNESOTA Ex Rel. THE CITY OF DULUTH
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day
This case comes here from the Supreme Court of Minnesota, to review a judgment of that court affirming a judgment in mandamus of the St. Louis County Court in that State, which required the Northern Pacific Railway Company, plaintiff in error, to repair a certain viaduct in the city of Duluth, carrying the railway company’s tracks over Lake avenue. 98 Minnesota, 429. The Northern Pacific Railway Company is' the successor in title of the St. Paul and Duluth Railroad Company, which derived its title from the Lake Superior and Mississippi Railroad Company. The Lake Superior and Mississippi…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Union Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by135 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- President of the Monongahela Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Denver & Rio Grande R. Co. v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Ford v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.