Legal Opinion

City of Cohasset v. Minnesota Power

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 12, 2010No. A09-572PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STAUBER, Judge.

On appeal from summary judgment in appellant city’s action for declaratory and injunctive relief to enforce its claimed right to require respondent to obtain a franchise or permit to operate its natural gas pipeline within the city’s borders, the city argues that the district court erred in concluding that respondent is not subject to the city’s franchise or general police power because respondent is not a natural gas public utility. Because respondent is not a natural gas public utility, we affirm.

FACTS

Respondent Minnesota Power is an operating division of Alíete, Inc.,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Davies v. West Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  4. In Re Condemnation by Dairyland Power CooperativeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Peterson v. HauleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Cohasset v. Minnesota PowerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. City of Cohasset v. Minnesota PowerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API