Legal Opinion
Keiser v. Conservation Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 9, 1996No. 13868PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his appeal from the decision of the named defendant, the Redding conservation commission (commission). The commission had approved the application of the water pollution control commission of Redding (WPCC), also a defendant in this action, without conducting a public hearing. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly found that substantial evidence existed to support the commission’s decisions approving the application and declining to conduct a public hearing. He also claims that the commission’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Feinson v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Primerica v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Seals v. HickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Red Hill Coalition, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. AlbertConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Wren v. MacPherson Interiors, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. RodriguezConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Forsell v. Conservation CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.