Legal Opinion
State v. Albert
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 13, 1998No. AC 15490PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPEAR, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1991) § 53a-70 (a) (2)1 and risk of injury *717to a child in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1991) § 53-21.2 The defendant’s principal claim is that penetration of the labia majora,3 as charged here, does not constitute sexual assault in the first degree because such penetration does not constitute “vaginal” intercourse as defined in General Statutes (Rev. to 1991) § 53a-65 (2).4 Consequently, the defendant…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- State v. RoqueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. KishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Frillici v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- United Illuminating Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. AlbertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Mack v. LaValleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Amsden v. FischerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Morales v. Pentec, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.