Szymanski v. Culmerville Coal Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
Frank Szymanski, claimant’s husband, was employed by defendant as a coal miner, for years. In October 1936 be had been operated upon for a perforating duodenal ulcer. Because of accompanying infection and extensive peritonitis the incision did not completely heal until the following April leaving a “weak area” at the site of the incision. In May 1937 he returned to work with defendant company as a coal loader. On June 24, 1937, overexertion in moving an excessively heavy piece of bony caused a break in the wall of the abdomen through the long incision of the former…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jones v. Phila. & Reading C. & I. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Shuler v. Midvalley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Eberst v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Reichner v. P. Blakiston's Son & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Watson v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Wahs v. Wolf (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Federoff v. Union Collieries Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Schrein v. Fleischmann's Vienna Model Bakery, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Krumrine v. Titan Metal Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.