Legal Opinion
Reichner v. P. Blakiston's Son & Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 25, 1934No. Appeal 321PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cunningham, J.,
The present controversy in this workmen’s compensation case had its origin in the filing with the board by claimant, on June 21, 1932, of a petition to “review” (as provided in Section 413 of the amendatory Workmen’s Compensation Act of June 26, 1919, P. L. 642, 661, and its amendment of April 13, 1927, P. L. 186, 194) a certain compensation agreement executed by him and his employer on January 17, 1931, and duly approved by the board.
The description therein of the accident and injury upon which it was based reads: “Slipped on stairway within building. Bight leg…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Zupicick v. P. & R. C. & I. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Kitchen v. Miller Bros. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- McKissick v. Penn Brook Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Zavatskie v. Phila. & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
3Cited by18 opinions
- Caudill v. CHATHAM MANUFACTURING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Eberst v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Conley v. Allegheny CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Dobash v. Jeddo-Highland Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Shetina v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.