Legal Opinion

Shuler v. Midvalley Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 4, 1928No. Appeal, 25PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

If the order of the compensation board to vacate the final agreement and reinstate the order of compensation is sustained in this case, then an employer will have no reliable means of knowing when his compensation obligations are at an end.

Appellee was injured on the 5th of August, 1921, and nearly six years afterwards the compensation board vacated the final agreement and settlement, and directed the employer to resume payment of compensation thereunder and to continue the same within the limitation of the act. It is not to be supposed that a final agreement and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Kuca v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Mudano v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. McCrosson v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Johnston v. Payne-Yost Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Gray's Hatchery & Poultry Farms, Inc. v. StevensSuperior Court of Delaware · 1950
  2. Buck v. ArndtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Williams v. Baptist Church (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Eberst v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Bucher v. Kapp Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API