Wahs v. Wolf (Et Al.)
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Reno, J.,
The real issue presented by the record in this workmen’s compensation case has been considerably beclouded by the unfortunate fact that the litigation has been before referees five times, before the board on nine occasions, and that four appeals have been taken to the court of common pleas. This appeal is by the employer’s insurance carrier from an order of the court below setting aside an agreement and final receipt as an illegal compromise and entering judgment on an award secured by claimant in 1933.
On March 25, 1932, claimant suffered an injury in the course of his…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Carville v. A. F. Bornot & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Hein v. LudwigSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Eberst v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Bronkowski v. Colonial Colliery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Bair v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cairgle v. AMERICAN R. AND SS CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Cairgle v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Klingler v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Lavely v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.