In Re Equity Funding Corp. of America Securities Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
1Opinion of the Court
*1380ORDER
The Panel having found, upon the basis of the papers submitted and the hearing held, that the actions listed on the attached Schedule A involve common questions of fact and that transfer of these actions to the Central District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings would serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and would further the just and efficient conduct of the litigation,
It is ordered that all actions on the attached Schedule A pending in districts other than the Central District of California? be, and the same hei'eby are, transferred to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re Plumbing Fixture CasesUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1968
- In Re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
- In Re Plumbing Fixture CasesUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1968
- In Re Penn Central Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
- In Re Penn Central Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- In Re Equity Funding Corp. of America Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1976
- In Re Equity Funding Corp. of America Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1977
- In Re Equity Funding Corporation Of America Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- In Re Janus Mutual Funds Investment LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2004
- Bancohio Corp. v. FoxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.