Pfizer Inc. v. Government of India
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart
In this case we are asked to decide whether a foreign nation is entitled to sue in our courts for treble damages under the antitrust laws. The respondents are the Government of India, the Imperial Government of Iran, and the Republic of the Philippines. They brought separate actions in Federal District Courts against the petitioners, six pharmaceutical manufacturing companies. The actions were later consolidated for pretrial purposes in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.1 The complaints alleged that the peti*310tioners had conspired to restrain and monopolize…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by205 opinions
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blue Shield of Va. v. McCreadySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Inc. v. Hydrolevel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
200 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.