Legal Opinion

In re Food Fair Securities Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided March 1, 1979No. 368PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

2Per curiam

I. BACKGROUND

This litigation consists of six actions pending in two districts: three in the *1302Southern District of New York and three in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The principal defendants in these actions are Food Fair, Inc. and several of its present and former officers and directors. Ten of these individuals are named as defendants in each action, and Food Fair is a defendant in four actions. Other defendants named in one or more of these actions include 1) a realty firm and three other companies (Richman Associates, Inc., MGS Incentives Company and Filigree…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Plumbing Fixture CasesUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1968
  2. In Re Republic National-Realty Equities Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974
  3. In Re Plumbing Fixture CasesUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1968
  4. In Re Commonwealth Oil/Tesoro Petroleum Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
  5. In Re Franklin National Bank Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. CONSUMERS DISTRIBUTING CO. LTD. v. Tele-Save Merchandising Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1982
  2. In Re DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., ASR Hip Implant Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
  3. In re Takata Airbag Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API