Legal Opinion
Homestake Mining Corp. v. Enerdyne Corp.
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided February 27, 1979No. 342PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Before MURRAY I. GURFEIN, Chairman, and EDWIN A. ROBSON, STANLEY A. WEIGEL, ANDREW A. CAFFREY, ROY W. HARPER, and CHARLES R. WEINER, Judges of the Panel. PER CURIAM.
I. BACKGROUND
A. The Actions In The Transferee District
On July 31, 1978, the Panel, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, transferred three actions (the TVA actions) to the Northern District of Illinois and, with the consent of that court, assigned them to the Honorable Prentice H. Marshall for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with a fourth action (Rio Algom) already pending there. In re Uranium Industry…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Gulf Oil Corporation, and United Nuclear CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- In re A. H. Robins Co.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
- In Re Westinghouse Electric Corporation Uranium Contract LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
- In Re Westinghouse Electric Corp. Uranium Contracts LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1975
- In Re Uranium Industry Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Uranium Industry Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1979