Legal Opinion
King v. Ohio Valley Terminix Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided June 25, 1948PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Morris, Commissioner
Reversing.
Appellant, plaintiff below, is tbe owner of a residence at Kings Mounds, Wickliffe, Kentucky. On April 2, 1942, be and appellee entered into contract whereby appellee agreed:
“To insulate the residence and laboratory against the attack of subterranean termites by applying Terminix in accordance with the requirements and specifications of E. L. Bruce Co., for the sum of $129.60. The undersigned warrants that any additional application of Terminix to insulate against the attack of termites found necessary upon re-inspection, shall be performed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Turner v. Central Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1945
- Fruit Growers Express Co. v. Citizens Ice & Fuel Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Dorton v. Ashland Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
- Snead v. WaiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
- Moore v. StanfillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brooks, Tarlton, Gilbert, Douglas & Kressler, Etc., Cross-Appellants v. United States Fire Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Lovington Cattle Feeders, Inc. v. Abbott LaboratoriesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- ORKIN EXT. COMPANY, INC. v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Ellis v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964
- Biszants v. Stephens ThoroughbredsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.