Williams v. O'Charley's, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
Plaintiff presented sufficient circumstantial evidence of a defect in the food to warrant the submission of an issue of breach of an implied warranty of merchantability to the jury. Plaintiff presented sufficient evidence of proximate cause and medical causation. The trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
I. Factual and Procedural History
Michael Williams (plaintiff) ate dinner at an O’Charley’s restaurant (defendant) in Concord on 18 March 2008. At about 8:15 p.m., plaintiff ordered grilled chicken, rice, and a baked…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Young v. Hickory Business FurnitureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- Holley v. Acts, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
- DeWitt v. Eveready Battery Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Hunt v. Montgomery Ward and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Johnson v. KanavosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- BMLA, Inc. D/B/A Murphy's Deli v. Keziah Jordan, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2021
- Cahoon v. Edward Orton Jr. Ceramic FoundationDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2020
- Chisum v. CampagnaNorth Carolina Business Court · 2019
- PRESNELL v. SNAP-ON SECURECORP., INC.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2022
- Sasso v. Tesla, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.