DBMS Consultants Ltd. v. Computer Associates International, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DAVID S. NELSON, District Judge.
This is a breach of contract action1 over which, it is asserted, this Court has diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The plaintiff DBMS Consultants Limited (“DBMS”) has applied for the issuance of a letter rogatory requesting the assistance of the Supreme Court of the State of New South Wales, Australia in compelling the deposition of a witness. The defendants oppose the application. For the reasons set forth below, the Court allows DBMS’s application to the extent that the Court will issue a letter rogatory requesting the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Howard D. ReaganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. James P. Staples, Bernard D. Oslin, Richard C. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Herbert K. Zassenhaus and Charlotte S. Zassenhaus v. The Evening Star Newspaper Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Tiedemann v. the SigneDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1941
- B & L Drilling Electronics v. TotcoDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lantheus Medical Imaging, Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Security Insurance v. Trustmark InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- In re Urethane Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2010
- Ethypharm S.A. France v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Planet Fitness International Franchise v. P JEG-United, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.