Legal Opinion
In re Urethane Antitrust Litigation
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 18, 2010No. 04-MD-1616-JWLPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JAMES P. O’HARA, United States Magistrate Judge.
This multidistrict litigation consists of class-action and direct-action lawsuits in which plaintiffs claim defendants engaged in unlawful price fixing and market-allocation conspiracies with respect to polyether polyol products in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. The parties have filed cross-motions for the issuance of so-called letters of request pursuant to the Hague Convention1 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 28(b), *363to obtain evidence from certain witnesses in Germany (docs. 1255 and 1284). Plaintiffs’ motion (doc.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. United States District Court for the Southern District of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Tulip Computers International B v. v. Dell Computer Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2003
- Valois of America, Inc. v. Risdon Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
- B & L Drilling Electronics v. TotcoDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- DBMP LLC v. THOSE PARTIES LISTED ON APPENDIX A TO COMPLAINT AND JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-1000; OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMANTS, and SANDER L. ESSERMAN, in his capacity as Legal Representative for Future Asbestos Claimants v. DBMP LLC and CERTAINTEED LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2026
- Spheretex GmbH v. Carbon-Core Corp.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2022
- Terran Biosciences, Inc. v. Compass Pathfinder LimitedDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025