Legal Opinion

Tiedemann v. the Signe

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided April 4, 1941No. 489PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAILLOUET, District Judge.

Proctors of record for the libelant herein, filed their motion suggesting to the court that they desire to procure the testimony of Oskar Tiedemann, the libelant, who is represented as residing at Vabaduse Valjak 10, Tallinn, Estonia.

It is made to appear by said motion that such testimony can not be secured, save and except by and through means of letters rogatory from this court, requesting the Supreme Court of the Russian Soviet Federated Socialist Republic, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, at Moscow, to assist this court in obtaining said testimony; and the…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. RosenDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
  2. In Re Letter Rogatory From the Justice Court, District of Montreal, Canada. Appeal of John FecarottaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  3. Lantheus Medical Imaging, Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  4. B & L Drilling Electronics v. TotcoDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1978
  5. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. LeeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API