Security Insurance v. Trustmark Insurance
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULINGS ON THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT TIG INSURANCE COMPANY’S MOTION FOR EXPEDITED PROTECTIVE ORDER AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSE TO ITS REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
DORSEY, District Judge.
Third-party defendant TIG Insurance Company (“TIG”) moves for a protective order regarding a letter rogatory issued by defendant against Fairfax Holdings, Ltd. (“Fairfax”), a Canadian company and parent company of TIG. Defendant moves to compel further production by TIG. Familiarity with prior rulings is presumed. For the reasons set forth, TIG’s motion for a protective order is denied and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Cheryl A. Gile v. United Airlines, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Guy O. Dove, Iii, Spargos Mining Nl v. Atlantic Capital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Eugene F. MARESCO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EVANS CHEMETICS, DIV. of W.R. GRACE & CO., Defendants AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Ferber v. Travelers Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Urethane Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2010
- HDT Bio Corp v. Emcure Pharmaceuticals LtdDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- JUBILANT GENERICS LIMITED v. DECHRA VETERINARY PRODUCTS LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2024
- LeGrand v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024