Legal Opinion
Driving Force, Inc. v. Manpower, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 15, 1980No. Civ. A. 79-3675PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WEINER, District Judge.
Plaintiff instituted this action seeking injunctive relief which would grant plaintiff the exclusive use of the name “The Driving Force, Inc.” Plaintiff filed the action under the Trademark Act of 1946, (Lanham Act), as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq., invoking jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1338 and pursuant to the diversity of citizenship provision contained in 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
The defendant has filed a counterclaim based upon the same statute and jurisdiction provision, seeking similar injunctive relief.
The parties have filed cross…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Ricci v. Chicago Mercantile ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mississippi Power & Light Company v. United Gas Pipe Line Company, State of Mississippi, Plaintiff-IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Esso Standard Oil Company v. Sun Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- D. M. & Antique Import Corp. v. Royal Saxe Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- A&h Sportswear, Inc Mainstream Swimsuits, Inc. v. Victoria's Secret Stores, Inc. Victoria's Secret Catalogue, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Goya Foods, Inc. v. Tropicana Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Maritz, Inc. v. Cybergold, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1996
- Tonka Corp. v. Rose Art Industries, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- C-Cure Chemical Co., Inc. v. Secure Adhesives Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.