Legal Opinion
Ricci v. Chicago Mercantile Exchange
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 9, 1973No. 71-858PublishedCited by 256 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
The question before us is whether in this antitrust case the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit properly stayed further judicial action pending administrative proceedings which the court deemed available under the Commodity Exchange Act, 42 Stat. 998, as amended, 7 U. S. C. § 1 et seq.
The case began when petitioner Ricci filed a complaint against the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, its president, vice president, and chairman of the board, and against the Siegel Trading Company, a member of the Exchange, and its president, charging a conspiracy in violation of the Sherman Act, 26 Stat. 209,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by256 opinions
- Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Reiter v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. WareSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mortensen v. First Federal Savings And Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Gordon v. New York Stock Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
251 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.