Legal Opinion
D. M. & Antique Import Corp. v. Royal Saxe Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 22, 1970No. 67 Civ. 4954PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LASKER, District Judge.
Plaintiff D. M. Antique Import Corporation (“D.M.”) brings this motion for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. D.M. seeks three forms of relief: first, a declaratory judgment that defendant Royal Saxe Corporation (“Royal Saxe”) has no rights in certain registered trademarks and that the Patent Office should cancel those marks; second, an injunction restraining Royal Saxe and its American distributor, Chelsea Import Company, Inc. (“Chelsea”) from interfering with D.M.’s china import business; and third, damages for…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Yale Electric Corporation v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Hardin v. Kentucky Utilities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- City of Chicago v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Genesee Brewing Company, Inc., D/B/A Highfalls Brewing Company v. Stroh Brewing Company, D/B/A Northern Plains Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- La Societe Anonyme Des Parfums Le Galion v. Jean Patou, Inc. And Michael Stramiello, Jr., Collector of Customs of the Portof New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Johnson & Johnson v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Quabaug Rubber Company v. Fabiano Shoe Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- LVL XIII Brands, Inc. v. Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.