A&h Sportswear, Inc Mainstream Swimsuits, Inc. v. Victoria's Secret Stores, Inc. Victoria's Secret Catalogue, Inc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
I. Facts. .208
II. Procedural History . .209
III. The Direct Confusion Claim. O rH 03
A. The Lapp Test and the District Court’s Opinion H rH 03
B. The Test for Directly Competing Goods. (M rH 03
C. The District Court’s Methodology. lO rH 03
IV. Review of the District Court’s Analysis.216
A. Similarity of the Marks.216
1. Sight, Sound, Meaning.217
2. The Housemarks and the Disclaimer.218
3. The PTO’s Rejection of Victoria’s Secret’s Application.220
4. Summary.221
B. Strength of the Marks.221
1. Distinctiveness or Conceptual Strength.221
2. Commercial Strength of the Mark .224
3. Summary.…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Doe Lang, Petitioner/defendant-Appellant v. Retirement Living Publishing Co., Inc., Respondent/plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by328 opinions
- Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Andrx Corporation Andrx Laboratories, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Mike Cohn, D.V.M. v. Petsmart, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Chanel, Inc. v. GordashevskyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- Boston Duck Tours, LP v. Super Duck Tours, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Checkpoint Systems, Inc. v. Check Point Software Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
323 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.