Legal Opinion
United States v. Andre Smith
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 22, 1993No. 91-50029PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed December 9, 1992, 982 F.2d 354, is withdrawn.
OPINION
WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:
Andre Smith appeals the sentence he received after pleading guilty to two counts of student loan fraud (20 U.S.C. § 1097 (1988)) and one count of making false statements to a government agency (18 U.S.C. § 1001). Smith contends that the district court erred in its application of the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“Sentencing Guidelines”). This court has jurisdiction of Smith’s timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for resentencing.
I. Facts
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Jose Jesus Lira-BarrazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. William George HowardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Lucio MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Robert Fine, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Andrew Earl ChapnickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. Lawrence BuchananCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Barbara E. Fraley v. United States Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Aquiles Chavez-PalaciosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward E. ALLEN, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Rosalio CorreaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.