Legal Opinion
United States v. Lawrence Buchanan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 6, 1995No. 94-10056PublishedCited by 147 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge TANG; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge REINHARDT.
TANG, Senior Circuit Judge:
Lawrence Buchanan appeals his eighteen-month sentence, which was imposed after Buchanan pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud and one count of failure to appear. Specifically, Buchanan contends that the district court erroneously calculated his criminal history score. The government argues that Buchanan cannot challenge his sentence because he knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal his sentence in his plea agreement. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Robert BolingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Jose Navarro-BotelloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Jomar Michlin, United States of America v. Rahsaan WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Juan Buenrostro-TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Juan Munoz-Dela RosaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by147 opinions
- United States v. TeeterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- United States v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Pascual Dionicio JeronimoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Donelle FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. BiblerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.