Legal Opinion
United States v. Andrew Earl Chapnick
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 29, 1992No. 91-50194PublishedCited by 110 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The memorandum disposition for this case is redesignated an opinion authored by Judge Poole.
OPINION
POOLE, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Andrew Earl Chapnick appeals his sentence of 112 months in federal prison, imposed upon conviction for bank robbery under the Sentencing Guidelines. Chapnick argues that the district court improperly classified him as a “career offender” because his two prior offenses should be considered either “consolidated for sentencing” or committed as part of a “common scheme or plan” under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. Scott Evan JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Jose Jesus Lira-BarrazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Earl Thomas AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Leonis Smith, United States of America v. Karen Lynn WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Phillip Dale SelfaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- United States v. Stacey C. Koon, Cross-Appellee. United States of America v. Laurence M. Powell, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. ReeseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. George Benitez Javier Ramirez Jose Camilo LizarragaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Samuel Manarite and Jeanne ManariteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. LorenzoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.