Legal Opinion
Posco v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided March 8, 2018No. Slip Op. 18–18; Consol. Court No. 16–00225PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Barnett, Judge:
In this consolidated action, Plaintiff POSCO ("POSCO"), Plaintiff Nucor Corporation *1326("Nucor"), and Plaintiff-Intervenors ArcelorMittal USA LLC, AK Steel Corporation, and United States Steel Corporation challenge the final determination of the U.S. Department of Commerce ("Commerce" or the "agency") in its countervailing duty ("CVD") investigation of cold-rolled steel products ("cold-rolled steel") from the Republic of Korea ("Korea"). See Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea , 81 Fed. Reg. 49,943 (Dep't Commerce…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- NEXTEEL Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- POSCO v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- POSCO v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Linyi Chengen Import & Export Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- NEXTEEL Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.