Legal Opinion

Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided September 21, 2018No. Slip Op. 18-123; Court 17-00057PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Katzmann, Judge:

*1313 The court today reviews another installment in the continuing mystery series, "Is It Classified As A Nail?" See OMG, Inc., v. United States , 42 CIT ----, 321 F.Supp.3d 1262 (May 29, 2018). Plaintiff Simpson Strong-Tie Company ("Simpson") challenges the Department of Commerce's ("Commerce") determination that zinc and nylon anchors imported by Simpson fall within the scope of the Antidumping Duty Orders on Certain Steel Nails from the People's Republic of China. Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Steel Nails from the People's Republic of China: Final Scope…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, and Mittal Steel USA Isg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Diversified Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  3. Wheatland Tube Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  4. Sioux Honey Ass'n v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  5. Duferco Steel, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Midwest Fastener Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
  2. Midwest Fastener Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
  3. Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API