Legal Opinion
Gamble-Skogmo, Inc. v. Paul E. Hawkinson Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 13, 1938No. 11148PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Circuit Judge.
The appellees brought suit in the district court charging appellants with infringement of the Hawkinson patents No. 1,917,261 and No. 1,917,262. The defenses are invalidity and no infringement. There was a decree for the plaintiffs and the defendants appeal.
Both patents pertain to the art of retreading worn automobile tire casings. A tire casing is the outer part of the tire within which the inner tube is placed. It is made of fabric covered with vulcanized rubber. The casing consists of three parts: (1) The bead rims, or enlarged parts of the tire usually containing…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Fur Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Claude Neon Lights, Inc. v. E. MacHlett & SonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- S. S. Kresge Co. v. Winget Kickernick Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pratt and Whitney Company, Inc., Ferdinando Carlo Reggio, and Chandler-Evans Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Pratt & Whitney Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Mason Corp. v. HalliburtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Goodman v. Paul E. Hawkinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Paul E. Hawkinson Co. v. GoodmanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.