Legal Opinion

Paul E. Hawkinson Co. v. Goodman

District Court, S.D. California

Decided February 21, 1940No. 1019-JPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, District Judge.

' This case involves claimed infringement of patent rights relating to the retreading of rubber tires used on automobiles of all kinds, including trucks. Claims 6 and 8 of patent No. 1,917,261 (method), and Claims 1 and 3 of patent No. 2,034,618 (apparatus), are involved. The trial of the cause occupied about three weeks’ time. It is not my *733purpose to do more than to state with as much brevity as possible my conclusions without reviewing in any detail the evidence.

Briefly, plaintiff, in his patent No. 1,917,261, claims to have discovered an improved method by which to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Super Mold Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  2. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc. v. Paul E. Hawkinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  3. Goodman v. Super Mold Corp. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. New York, C. & St. L. R. Co. v. VardamanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  2. McCann v. Bentley Stores CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1940
  3. Lunn v. United Aircraft Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1960
  4. Welter v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1941
  5. Boaz v. Mutual Life Ins.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API