Legal Opinion

S. S. Kresge Co. v. Winget Kickernick Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 16, 1938No. 10818-10820PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Circuit Judge.

Máry D. Neilson was granted patent No. 1,389,067 covering “Undergarments for Women”. She was also granted patent No. 1,680,267 which she thereafter surrendered upon Reissue No. 17,903 — this patent being' for “Process of making garments for women and children.” Thereafter, she gave an exclusive license to Winget Kickernick Company to make, use and sell under these patents. Also, the Winget company is owner of the registered trademark ‘-‘Kicker-nick” as applicable to garments manufactured by it.

January 29, 1935, Mrs. Neilson and the Winget company filed a suit against S.…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Kessler v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. J. C. Penney Co. v. H. D. Lee Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  2. David Sherman Corporation, Doing Business as the Sarnoff Company v. Heublein, Inc., Doing Business as Ste Pierre Smirnoff, FlsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  3. McGraw-Hill Pub. Co. v. American Aviation Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  4. Little Tavern Shops, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  5. F. W. Fitch Co. v. Camille, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API