Legal Opinion

Janowsky v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 3, 1996No. 90-3846 CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

TURNER, Judge.

Plaintiffs assert entitlement to damages on theories of contract and Fifth Amendment taking. A prior published opinion, Janowsky v. United States, 23 Cl.Ct. 706 (1991), rev’d and remanded, 989 F.2d 1203 (Fed.Cir.1993) (Table), describes their claims.

This opinion addresses (1) defendant’s motion filed April 10, 1995, for summary judgment with respect to plaintiffs’ contract claim (count I of the complaint) and to dismiss plaintiffs’ taking claim (count II of the complaint) and (2) defendant’s motion filed August 4, 1995, to dismiss the complaint to the extent…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Timothy A. Janowsky and Peggy J. Janowsky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. Heydt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  3. Perri v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  4. Nematollahi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  5. Hawkins & Powers Aviation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API