Legal Opinion
Timothy A. Janowsky and Peggy J. Janowsky v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 6, 1998No. 96-5137PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Per curiam
Timothy A and Peggy J. Janowsky appeal the United States Court of Federal Claims’ summary judgment, 1 Janowsky v. United States, 36 Fed. Cl. 148 (1996), dismissing their contract and Fifth Amendment taking claims. We vacate the judgment and remand the case.
Background
In September or October of 1984, Federal Bureau of Investigation agents informed Timothy Janowsky that he “was number 8 on [an unspecified] hit list” and advised him “to be careful and keep [his] head down.” 2 Shortly thereafter, they asked Janowsky to help them investigate bribery, extortion, and corruption by and among local…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- SGS-92-X003 v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Vargas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Telenor Satellite Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Huntington Promotional & Supply, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Monument Realty LLC v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.