Legal Opinion
Nematollahi v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 7, 1997No. 95-824CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
YOCK, Judge.
This contract action comes before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). The plaintiffs’ Complaint seeks damages based on claims of contractual misrepresentation, unilateral mistake, and unjust enrichment arising out of the plaintiffs’ purchase of residential real estate from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) that contained contaminated well water.
After a full and careful examination of the pleadings, briefs, and submissions filed by the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Enron Federal Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- United States Ex Rel. Roby v. Boeing Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
- Price v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Detroit Housing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Globe Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.