Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. New Plastic Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 28, 1956No. Civ. A. 9054Published

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, P. J.

Plaintiff sought in vain to recover for services rendered under a contract repudiated, during its life, by the defendant. We have not had the benefit of findings, nor of any opinion by the trial court, to indicate to us the theory on which its judgment was based. As we should do (Estate of Rule (1944), 25 Cal.2d 1, 10 [152 P.2d 1003, 1007, 155 A.L.R. 1319]) we made the best use of the evidence that we could, to support the judgment, but nevertheless we have reached these conclusions: that the plaintiff was entitled to damages for defendant’s repudiation of the contract; and that the failure…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. McCluskey v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Bomberger v. McKelveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Hensler v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Ross v. Frank W. Dunne Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API