Legal Opinion

Wells v. Times Printing Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1913No. 11511PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered May 8, 1913, dismissing an action for libel, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

Appellant brought an action against respondent, charging it with libel in publishing certain articles of and concerning him. In the second amended complaint, three causes of action, based upon three publications, were set forth. These articles were set forth in full as published, to which was added an allegation that they were wholly false and maliciously published for the purpose of injuring appellant in his reputation and to expose him to public hatred, contempt, ridicule, and disgrace. A demurrer was interposed to this complaint, which was sustained upon the ground that the articles…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Triggs v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. McClure v. Review Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Lathrop v. SundbergWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Byrne v. FunkWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Quinn v. Review Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Holden v. American News Co.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1943
  2. Luna De La Peunte v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Graham v. Star Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. McKillip v. Grays Harbor Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Tennant v. F. C. Whitney & SonsWashington Supreme Court · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API