Legal Opinion

McClure v. Review Publishing Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1905No. 5329PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Belt, J., entered January 12, 1904, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action for libel.

1Opinion of the Court

Dunbar, I.

This is an action to- recover damages -or alleged libelous articles, published of and concerning the plaintiff Anna McClure, in respondent’s newspapers, the Daily Spokesman-Eeview and the Twice-a-Week Spokesman-Eeview. The plaintiffs, on their own motion, amended the original complaint, and, as amended, defendant moved to make the same more definite- and certain by furnishing or incorporating in it copies of the entire articles in which the alleged libelous matter appeared. This mo*163tion was sustained, and an exception taken to the court’s ruling. The second amended complaint was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Urban v. HelmickWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Haynes v. Spokane Chronicle Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Hall v. Elgin Dairy Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Kimble v. KimbleWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Leghorn v. Review Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Lancour v. Herald & Globe Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  2. Glenn v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. O'NEAL v. Tribune CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. Kilgore v. KoenOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Tilles v. Pulitzer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API