Legal Opinion

Holden v. American News Co.

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided October 7, 1943No. 323PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWELLENBACH, District Judge.

This is a libel action in which the defendants have interposed motions for judgment non obstante veredicto and for new trial after the return of a jury’s verdict in favor of plaintiff. The article alleged to be libelous was published in the December 22, 1942, issue of Pic Magazine. The American News Company, a New York Corporation (hereafter called the Company) whose business it is to distribute magazines throughout the United States,, and C. A. Hawksley, the local representative of the Company, are defendants. In the original complaint, Street & Smith…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Burt v. Advertiser Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  3. Peck v. Tribune Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Post Pub. Co. v. HallamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
  5. Wilson v. Sun Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Hartmann v. Time, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  2. Johnson Publishing Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  3. Herron v. KING Broadcasting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Hartmann v. Time, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Winrod v. Time, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1948

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API