Legal Opinion

Byrne v. Funk

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1905No. 5258PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurs-ton county, Linn, J., entered February 26, 1904, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for libel.

1Per curiam

This is an action to recover damages* for an alleged libel. The complaint charges that the defendant published, and caused to be printed, of and concerning the plaintiff, in a newspaper called the “Morning Olympian,” printed and published in the city of Olympia, and generally distributed and circulated therein, the false and defamatory matter following, to wit:

“Mr. Byrne, you say something about an easily found evidence as to my reliability as regards figures, and thee you quote me as saying that the current expense fund has paid into it $2,382.57, and go on to say that the amount actually…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moore v. . FrancisNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Brewer v. ChaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Chaffin v. LynchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1888
  4. State v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Sun Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Woodhouse v. PowlesWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Quinn v. Review Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Ziebell v. Lumbermens Printing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Dusabek v. MartzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API